Is Pandemic Fallout Still Affecting Assessments?
Tuesday, December 20, 2022
As we enter another winter with health experts predicting a “triple-demic” of flu, COVID-19, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), researchers are learning more about how the pandemic has affected students around the world. Learning loss in reading and mathematics is well documented. But is pandemic fallout affecting your assessments in other ways?
Here’s an overview of the changes many students are experiencing post-pandemic, and how they could still be affecting assessments and evaluations.
Neurodevelopmental Differences
As the brain matures, its cortical thickness decreases. Researchers have recently found that getting older isn’t the only thing that thins the cortex. Adverse events such as family dysfunction and abuse can also trigger cortical thinning.
New studies have looked at cortical thickness among teens who experienced the pandemic. Researchers are noticing the same neurodevelopmental changes in their brains as those that occur with early adversity. Studies show that the hippocampus and amygdala, two structures in the brain associated with memory and emotion regulation, also grew rapidly during the pandemic. In other words, the pandemic seems to have accelerated brain aging in teens.
It isn’t yet clear whether these changes will be long-lasting. It’s also not clear how—or if—these changes will impact assessments going forward. Researchers caution that “if these changes are found to be enduring, accounting for and interpreting data acquired during this period will require additional attention and consideration” (Gotlib et al., 2022).
Social–Emotional Development
For many children, school provides more than academic education. It’s the place where they access
- food programs,
- emotional support and safety,
- opportunities to build friendships, and
- education focused on coping and stress-reduction skills.
To find out whether the pandemic affected social–emotional learning (SEL), researchers at the University of Cambridge, UK, and Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia, asked students to rate how strongly they agreed or disagreed with these statements:
- I feel confident talking to others.
- Other people like me.
- I like to share things with others.
- I help others when they need help.
- I make friends easily.
- If I hurt someone, I say sorry.
- I am polite towards others (e.g., greetings, saying thank you).
Using data gathered before and after schools closed, researchers found that students scored themselves lower after the pandemic than they had the year before. The effects were worse for students in rural areas and better for those in wealthier families (Bayley et al., 2022).
The findings are aligned with other studies, such as Harvard’s Early Learning Study. In that study, researchers reported that 61% of parents said their child’s social–emotional development was affected by the pandemic (Hanno et al., 2021).
Social–emotional skills have been linked to better learning. For that reason, researchers think the lingering effects are likely to worsen educational inequities linked to gender, age, and income.
SEL skills can affect assessments and evaluations in lots of ways, including these:
- Social–emotional skills are included in the diagnostic criteria for some neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism and ADHD (CDC, 2022).
- When students experience difficulties in SEL, self-confidence and self-esteem can drop, which may affect student performance on a wide range of assessments.
- Poorer social–emotional development may affect academic learning and recovery, so performance on cognitive assessments may be affected (Bayley et al., 2022).
Mental Health
Perhaps the most widely reported effect of the pandemic has been the marked rise in anxiety and depression among young people. A recent meta-analysis found that the rates of these internalizing symptoms have doubled since the early days of the pandemic (Racine et al., 2021). Older teens and people assigned female at birth are experiencing worse symptoms, researchers say.
The sharp rise in the risk for mental health problems prompted the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to recommend that all teens ages 12–18 be screened for major depressive disorder. The USPSTF also recommended that children and teens ages 8–18 years be screened for anxiety (USPSTF, 2022).
As you conduct assessments and evaluations, it’s important to know several things:
- High anxiety can lower scores on cognitive and neurocognitive tests, including those used to identify concussion syndrome (Champigny et al., 2020) and learning disabilities (Schulze et al., 2022).
- Social anxiety, in particular, can disrupt the ability to concentrate and reduce academic achievement (Leigh et al., 2021).
- Anxiety can interfere with executive function, a group of skills that includes working memory; the ability to plan, organize, and shift efficiently from task to task; and emotion regulation (Ursache & Raver, 2014). People with ADHD and learning disabilities such as dyslexia often have differences in executive function (Crisci et al., 2021).
- Depression is associated with changes in some cognitive abilities, such as processing speed and concentration (Wang et al., 2019). Both abilities could impact a student’s performance on a range of assessments.
- Depression can also lower self-esteem and can lead students to think they have less cognitive ability than they actually do (Srisurapanont et al., 2017).
As clinicians, educators, and families address learning loss, evaluate health conditions, and plan services for students, part of the work will be acknowledging the changes the pandemic has brought about for all of us. We’ll need more research, more awareness, and more compassion moving forward.
Further Reading
- Post-Pandemic Depression is Hitting Kids and Teens Hard: Can You Spot the Signs?
- Day-to-Day Depression: What to Look For in Teens
Research and Resources:
Bayley, S., Rose, P., Meshesha, D. W., Woldehanna, T., Yorke, L., & Ramchandani, P. (2022). Ruptured school trajectories: Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on school dropout, socio-emotional and academic learning using a longitudinal design. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.88157
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022, November 2). Diagnostic criteria. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/hcp-dsm.html
Champigny, C. M., Rawana, J., Iverson, G. L., Maxwell, B., Berkner, P. D., & Wojtowicz, M. (2020). Influence of anxiety on baseline cognitive testing and symptom reporting in adolescent student athletes. Journal of Neurotrauma, 37(24), 2632–2638. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7079
Gotlib, I. H., Miller, J. G., Borchers, L. R., Coury, S. M., Costello, L. A., Garcia, J. M., & Ho, T. C. (2022). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and brain maturation in adolescents: Implications for analyzing longitudinal data. Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science, 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.11.002. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.11.002
Hanno, E. C., Wiklund Hayhurst, E., Fritz, L., Gardner, M., Turco, R. G., Jones, S.M., Lesaux, N. K., Hofer, K., Checkoway, A., & Goodson, B. (2021). Persevering through the pandemic: Key learnings about children from parents and early educators. Saul Zaentz Early Education Initiative, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Leigh, E., Chiu, K., & Clark, D. M. (2021). Is concentration an indirect link between social anxiety and educational achievement in adolescents? PloS One, 16(5), e0249952. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249952
Racine, N., McArthur, B. A., Cooke, J. E., Eirich, R., Zhu, J., & Madigan, S. (2021). Global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 175(11), 1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2482
Schulze, K. J., Robinson, M., MacKenzie, H. M., & Dickey, J. P. (2022). Association of preexisting mental health conditions with increased initial symptom count and severity score on SCAT5 when assessing concussion. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 10(9), 23259671221123581. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221123581
Srisurapanont, M., Suttajit, S., Eurviriyanukul, K., & Varnado, P. (2017). Discrepancy between objective and subjective cognition in adults with major depressive disorder. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 3901. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04353-w
Ursache, A., & Raver, C. C. (2014). Trait and state anxiety: Relations to executive functioning in an at-risk sample. Cognition & Emotion, 28(5), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.855173
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2022, October 11.) Anxiety in children and adolescents: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/screening-anxiety-children-adolescents
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2022, October 11). Depression and suicide risk in children and adolescents: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/screening-depression-suicide-risk-children-adolescents
Wang, G., Si, T. M., Li, L., Fang, Y., Wang, C. X., Wang, L. N., Tan, K. H. X., Ettrup, A., Eriksen, H. F., Luo, S., & Ge, L. (2019). Cognitive symptoms in major depressive disorder: Associations with clinical and functional outcomes in a 6-month, non-interventional, prospective study in China. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 15, 1723–1736. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S195505